It was never the objective of Gramm-Rudman to trigger sequester.
John Kline: “It was never the objective of Gramm-Rudman to trigger sequester.”
Editor's note · Context
Clarifying that the intent of the original legislation was to encourage compromise, not to enforce cuts.
Share
More from John Kline
During the eight long years our team spent working to pass this bill, no topic was more hotly debated than that of annual testing. . . In the end, we arrived at a fair and sensible compromise in the law: Keep the requirement that the same…
I cannot State emphatically enough that far-reaching reform, fiscal responsibility, and bipartisanship must be the principles that guide us as we work to solve this problem.
Republicans and Democrats have a history of bipartisan cooperation on this issue.
There is nothing fair or excusable about a 75-year-old retiree with health care concerns finding out that the pension he was promised just isn't funded.





