On the recordSeptember 20, 2012
I have got a number of issues to address here. We've heard so much in a relatively short period of time here. We heard from some of our colleagues that we haven't brought a jobs bill. My colleagues on both sides of the aisle know very well that we have brought many jobs bills. In fact, over 30 of them have passed this House--most of them in a bipartisan way--and are sitting in the Senate. We just don't happen to believe that trillions more of borrowed money to jump-start the economy is a jobs bill. That's been proven to fail. This, in fact, is a jobs bill because we want people on welfare to get to work. And so we've heard that, no, this information memorandum, which has been now correctly determined to be a rule--an information memorandum designed to bypass Congress--will in fact weaken the work requirements. And so how do we draw that conclusion? From a number of things. One, we're very concerned about the definition of ``work.'' We've heard the number, 20 percent increase. It actually means instead of 1.5 percent of people leaving with a ``job'' that we still haven't quite defined, apparently, we'd have 1.8 percent. Not an overwhelming number. And then we have the nonpartisan, ever-present Congressional Budget Office that has joined us with this opinion. Under the memorandum: CBO expects the penalties for States that don't meet the work requirements specified in the Social Security Act would be reduced. It sounds like waiving work requirements to me.…
Source
govinfo.gov




