Certainly. And I thank the gentleman. And I share that concern. In the hearing yesterday, I made it very clear that the committee would move forward with the broader changes that the gentleman just discussed, Madam Speaker, so that the Coast Guard will have authority to draw larger sums, in hundred-million-dollar increments, with proper notification to Congress, without having to come back and legislate each time. But that is beyond the scope of the pending bill. And the technical changes notified to us are of a truly technical nature. Expanding into the broader question that we are now discussing would require new legislation. And I commit to the gentleman that that will be part of our bipartisan work in committee, and we will craft the appropriate language.
Share & report
More from James Oberstar
This is a matter that belongs to the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct. I yield back the balance of my time and move the previous question. The previous question was ordered. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is on the motion…
I yield myself 1 minute to respond to a repeated misunderstanding of and misconstruction of the language referring to antitrust immunity. Airlines are free to engage in alliances and have been ever since the Deregulation Act of 1978. The…
The purpose for this request is that we may resolve a technical problem that the Senate notified us of in the drafting of the language of the bill and in the reference to the appropriate section of the Internal Revenue Code, and we need to…
How much time remains on our side? The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman has 9\1/2\ minutes remaining.





