Political Quotes

James Oberstar: I rise in support of H.R. 3068. This bill represents an important step in ensuring the safety of Federal employees and…

On the recordOctober 2, 2007
I rise in support of H.R. 3068. This bill represents an important step in ensuring the safety of Federal employees and all those who work in and visit our Federal buildings. I thank the Delegate of the District of Columbia (Ms. Norton), chair of the Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings, and Emergency Management, for bringing this issue to the attention of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure and for quickly developing and advancing, in a bipartisan manner, a remedy. On April 18, 2007, the committee held a hearing entitled ``Proposals to Downsize the Federal Protective Service and Effects on the Protection of Federal Buildings''. The hearing probed the Department of Homeland Security's plans to cut the presence of Federal Protective Service, FPS, officers nationally. The reliance on contract security guards to protect Federal buildings is a troubling trend. H.R. 3068 prohibits the award of contracts to provide guard services under the contract security guard program of the FPS to any business that is owned, controlled, or operated by an individual who has been convicted of a felony. The bill directs the Secretary of Homeland Security to promulgate regulations within 6 months to implement the provisions of this act.
Said by
James Oberstar
Democratic · Minnesota

Editor's note · Context

Discussing the importance of H.R. 3068 for the safety of Federal employees and buildings.

Share

More from James Oberstar

Jul 20, 2010

I thank the gentlewoman for yielding and her strong, stout defense of the Railroad Retirement program; Mr. Perriello for his leadership and advocacy for the bill supporting the goals and ideals of Railroad Retirement Day; and for the…

govinfo.gov
Jun 10, 2010

It is better for us to pass this bill now to address the substantive issue, release of funds from the Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund, and not delay progress in cleanup.

govinfo.gov
Sep 20, 2010

But we all also recognize that the potential cost of meeting these needs is immense.

congress.gov
Jul 30, 2010

I have worked with the gentleman and our committee staff to craft this language. It's important to note that these are not taxpayer dollars paying for restoration, but rather proceeds from a penalty provided in this provision that is very…

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation