Mr. Speaker, in the early years of aviation, with cities that first built airports, only later did States come. As late as 1958, only seven States provided financial assistance and support for airport construction. It was in the 1940s, long before the State of Illinois ever got into the business of supporting airports, that the Chicago City Council looked into the crystal ball and saw that the future was aviation and had the foresight to buy orchard fields and an additional 7,000 acres to build O'Hare. On the matter of constitutionality, I just want to point out, and I was concerned about this, we inquired with the John Paul Stephens professor of law at Northwestern University, Professor Thomas Merrill, to get his opinion on the constitutionality. His view is that 'the Illinois Aeronautics Act was not protected by the Tenth Amendment. The Illinois Aeronautics Act is unique. Regulation aviation capacity cannot be deemed a core or traditional State function that might be protected by the Tenth Amendment. This legislation does not require the State of Illinois to proactively regulate its citizens, it merely prohibits the State of Illinois from interfering with the city of Chicago's ability to expand capacity at O'Hare.' Mr. Speaker, I think that clearly this legislation is within the authority of the Congress.
James Oberstar: “Mr. Speaker, in the early years of aviation, with cities that first built airports, only later did States come. As late…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the history and constitutionality of airport construction legislation.
Share
More from James Oberstar
The Coast Guard Authorization Act of 2010 is a bill this committee has worked on for the past 4 years, actually 6 years, starting in the time of the Republican majority, when our committee was united, our committee was unified behind this…
I offer my very sincere and genuine personal gratitude to the gentlewoman from Minnesota, Ms. McCollum, and to the gentleman from Minnesota, Mr. Peterson, for cosponsoring this Special Order. Never have I been the subject of a Special…
In House floor consideration of the railroad retirement program, it was made very clear time and again by both sides of the aisle that this plan for railroad retirement was not a formula for Social Security. Both sides were at pains to say…
I would just conclude that it's inappropriate for us to impose this penalty on the FAA through the appropriation process. A much more appropriate way would be to deal with it through our committee. I commit to the gentleman that we will…





