This amendment makes technical changes to the underlying bill. It ensures the continued competitive nature of the National Estuary Program. We ensure that the program evaluations will assess whether the implementation of a comprehensive conservation and management plan is achieving its stated goals. The amendment will enhance public education on the connections between air, land, water, and the potential impacts of those factors on the health of the estuary. It will strike the existing statutory priority list of estuaries. It will remove individuals from the list of approved recipients for grants under this program. First, the technical changes will ensure that program evaluations determine whether the implementation of a management plan is reaching its stated goals. It will ensure that not only the plan but the implementation of the plan is achieving improvements in water quality and habitat in the estuary. Second, the amendment ensures that the public education component of any management plan will include and will highlight the connections within the estuary between air, land, and water and the potential impacts of those interactions. Estuaries will be able to highlight to citizens living within the boundaries of the estuary how their actions will affect the health of the estuary and how they can change their habits or how they can change their actions to improve the quality of the estuary.
James Oberstar: “This amendment makes technical changes to the underlying bill. It ensures the continued competitive nature of the…”
Editor's note · Context
The speaker discusses an amendment to enhance the National Estuary Program and its public education efforts.
Share
More from James Oberstar
In House floor consideration of the railroad retirement program, it was made very clear time and again by both sides of the aisle that this plan for railroad retirement was not a formula for Social Security. Both sides were at pains to say…
We want to protect our waters. We want to protect our wetlands. We want to provide for future generations.
The FAA in January of this year initiated a process to address the issues created by the so-called ``through-the-fence'' agreements. They formed a policy review team to gather information, evaluate the concerns, decide what kind of action…
Well, it is to replace what has been destroyed. It's really just clarifying what is already available under OPA, but making it clear that the funds can be used for those resources that have been damaged so badly they can't be restored.





