Mr. Chairman, the exchange that we have just had between the Michigan delegation, or its voice, and the Wisconsin delegation and the previous amendment offered by the gentleman from Illinois, point up a problem that we have to face and to which I alluded in my previous remarks, and that is the Buy America provisions that affect activities under the jurisdiction of our Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure need to be revisited and thought through and refined. We have two very differing views of the application of the Buy American Act to the procurement at hand that the Coast Guard is involved with. The Coast Guard is opposed to the amendment. They say the Deepwater Program will comply with the Buy American Act. The Coast Guard and the prime contractor on this procurement, Lockheed Martin, have not, to the best of my knowledge, yet selected the engine to be used, although it is widely known and supposed that it will be the Detroit Diesel engine, with major parts made in Germany, assembled in the United States. That is where the refinements come in; products, parts of which are made overseas, assembled in the United States. We have lost the whole subway, locomotive and passenger car business to overseas producers. We have lost virtually all light rail and heavy rail production to overseas. Only just recently, Colorado Railcar has come in to produce a very high quality commuter rail vehicle.
James Oberstar: “Mr. Chairman, the exchange that we have just had between the Michigan delegation, or its voice, and the Wisconsin…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the Buy America provisions and their impact on transportation procurement.
Share
More from James Oberstar
In House floor consideration of the railroad retirement program, it was made very clear time and again by both sides of the aisle that this plan for railroad retirement was not a formula for Social Security. Both sides were at pains to say…
I have worked with the gentleman and our committee staff to craft this language. It's important to note that these are not taxpayer dollars paying for restoration, but rather proceeds from a penalty provided in this provision that is very…
I, too, have natural resources--national forests, national parks, wildlife refuges. When fire, as it does regularly, strikes the national forest, that land regenerates. The oil destroys. It likely cannot be restored by itself or by human…
The gentleman from Washington is mistaken in his understanding or his reading of the amendment that I offer. It's an amendment to OPA. It is not an amendment to the dollar amounts and does not reference dollar amounts. Under OPA, of which…





