I would like to make it clear that this is not legislation which is in any way concerning President Bush's distinguished service to this country. The controversy, instead, is over whether or not we create yet another special fellowship program in addition to the 760 that we already have on the books. The question is whether or not we are going to consolidate and somehow streamline some of our activities or if we are going to continue to have this sort of unravel into a series of programs that are almost impossible for us to oversee in Congress. I certainly would join and associate myself with the remarks of my colleagues from Pennsylvania and Mississippi about the distinguished career of President Bush, but I think that there is no more distinguishing tribute to his service in this body and as the President than to say that we are going to practice the type of austerity and fiscal responsibility that he so well preached himself.
David Minge: “I would like to make it clear that this is not legislation which is in any way concerning President Bush's distinguished…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of creating a new fellowship program related to President Bush's service.
Share
More from David Minge
I know that in talking with both physicians and with seniors in my area, that often seniors are making a choice between groceries and prescription drugs. I hear this over and over. They are amazed at the cost of prescription drugs. They…
The Fairness Caucus is committed to ending the regional disparities that exist with respect to Medicare today. The fact that seniors in some parts of the country are already receiving prescription drugs as a part of Medicare, at no premium…
Well, I thank my colleague, and I would just like to comment for the benefit of our colleagues on this problem with CBO scoring. I think that it is sort of easy to forget that we established the Congressional Budget Office, or CBO, in…





