the cuts in this rescission bill are devastating, WIC, jobs for youth in the summer, fuel assistance for low-income Americans, foster care and adoption services, student loan programs, housing for low-income Americans, local water treatment costs for programs mandated by Congress. Can we justify the cuts for these programs in order to finance tax cuts for the more affluent members of our communities and increased military spending? Absolutely not. Going further, we have a convoluted budget-cutting process. In my opinion, there are criteria for deficit reduction. We would not simply say that it is deficit reduction to plan to shave $200 billion off interest on the national debt. That is not realistic. We need to have, if we are going to impose deficit reduction on the American people, shared sacrifice. We should not be balancing the budget on the backs of the poor, the veterans, and children. Where are the cuts in the weapons systems that the Defense Department does not want? Where are the cuts in programs for those of us with higher incomes? We are cutting the most vulnerable first. This stands our proud heritage of fairness on its head. At the very minimum, let us assure low-income Americans, students, and local communities that their disproportionate sacrifice goes for deficit reduction. I urge you to vote for this amendment. It mandates real deficit reduction. It locks in the savings for 1995 and for years to come.
David Minge: “the cuts in this rescission bill are devastating, WIC, jobs for youth in the summer, fuel assistance for low-income…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the impact of cuts in a rescission bill on low-income programs and advocating for shared sacrifice.
Share
More from David Minge
it appears that the debate of the day is over the marriage tax penalty, and we have had a very attractive picture of a young couple at their wedding and an indication of what it costs that young couple. I do not think there is any real…
There is a fair amount of cynicism and I would say even despair among young people. They feel they are paying in, it is about 12.4 percent in payroll tax for Social Security and that this is a benefit that is for their parents, their…
we have returned here in the year 2000 to begin our work as the U.S. House of Representatives. One of the first bills that we will take up will come on, I expect, February 14. The purpose of this is to address a problem which has been a…
I would also like to report that I am familiar with the Indian tribe that is involved here, the Lower Sioux community. It is in my congressional district. It is a relatively small Indian community, Native American community; but I would…





