I, too, want to rise in support of this amendment because I also think that some of the rhetoric on this piece of legislation has been overblown. I think that the other side of the aisle is to be commended, in that they have moved in our direction and included some amendments and some ideas that we have suggested. I think we have a workable piece of legislation. If the problems that some people see are there, I think it will be solved by this amendment. We will have a chance to come back and take a look at it. I think this bill will work pretty close to the way it is put together, and I strongly support this amendment.
Collin Peterson: “I, too, want to rise in support of this amendment because I also think that some of the rhetoric on this piece of…”
Editor's note · Context
Supporting an amendment during a legislative debate.
Share
More from Collin Peterson
These prices that everybody talks about, if you are a real farmer out there and goes to your elevator, you cannot get a contract at these prices. And if you really want to do something here on this floor that will do some good, it would be…
It is not a constitutional quagmire. I don't know why people bring this up, because it was clear in this 1892 court case what the situation is. The thing is, we initially asked, if I could explain, if it was possible to re-enroll the bill…
I think what people need to understand, the farmer that sold the day before Katrina got his money out of the marketplace, and what the LDP did is protect those farmers that sold later to get the same price that farmer got right before…
The Davis-Kirk amendment to the 2007 farm bill would erase sugar policy measures that are designed to save taxpayers funds and prevent the U.S. sugar market from being overrun with subsidized foreign sugar. The economic impact in Minnesota…





