I rise today to support the Gutknecht amendment along with my fellow MN Colleagues. In January these soldiers wrote to me and every member of the MN delegation asking for help. And I believe as their representatives we have an obligation to address their concerns. This amendment will correct a technicality that is affecting 400 Minnesota National Guardsmen who are now serving in Iraq. And who knows how many other hundreds or even thousands of reservists all over the country have fallen victim to a similar technicality . Most of these soldiers had previously served on active duty in 2003, some in Bosnia and the others in Kosovo. The two groups were activated by different orders and now both of these groups are activated together under the same order in Iraq. The soldiers who served in Bosnia are not eligible for the extra $1,000 per month in incentive pay because their tours cannot be added together due to a mere technicality. This issue is about fairness. Unless something is done to change this Army policy, these soldiers and their families will lose out on $6,000 to $7,000 in extra pay. They are making a huge sacrifice for our country and this is the least we can and should do for these men and women.
Collin Peterson: “I rise today to support the Gutknecht amendment along with my fellow MN Colleagues. In January these soldiers wrote to…”
Share
More from Collin Peterson
But I just want to make clear that in my opinion what we're doing here is not a tax increase. And frankly, what we ought to be doing is investigating why we have all these people on the payroll at the State Department and at the Treasury…
I rise today to commend the good people of Minnesota who have banded together to begin the healing process. When that bridge fell, every citizen of my State felt the grief and the pain together. It has certainly been a difficult couple of…
I've been working with the gentleman from Virginia on this issue, and I think he has some good ideas here that we have been working through, but we just aren't at the point where we're comfortable on this side at this point. If I could…
I take very much issue with your saying we are waiving PAYGO. We are not waiving PAYGO. We are not waiving PAYGO in this bill. We are meeting PAYGO requirements based on the 2007 baseline which is what we started the bill under. This is…





