I rise in support of the LaFalce motion to instruct. Mr. Speaker, the fact is that the Senate and House bills, with regard to financial modernization, are significantly different. While they both embrace financial modernization and extend new powers and responsibilities to the insurance securities and banking entities, bringing about really a revolution in terms of the way we engage our financial services, the fact is that it is only the House bill that offers strong, new consumer protections that are vitally necessary in that electronic world, including the privacy provisions that have been written by the Committee on Banking and Financial Services and the Committee on Commerce and strongly supported on a bipartisan basis, at least on the floor. The fact is that those provisions ought to be retained in terms of this conference. I think that the House can empower the conferees by, in fact, supporting this motion and giving us a strong vote and a reendorsement in defiance to the Senate's position, which has very few protections or hardly addresses this basic issue.
Bruce F. Vento: “I rise in support of the LaFalce motion to instruct. Mr. Speaker, the fact is that the Senate and House bills, with…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing consumer protections in financial modernization legislation during House floor debate.
Share
More from Bruce F. Vento
H.R. 350 is misguided legislation that could delay and handcuff this Body to prevent the passage of sound policy and laws. H.R. 350 ignores history and dooms Congressional ability to respond to a crisis. Many of my Colleagues have only…
A recent series of articles in my hometown paper, the St. Paul Pioneer Press in Minnesota, highlighted a disturbing incidence nationwide of patient fatalities and injuries due to hospital errors... The most comprehensive study conducted by…
I rise with some concerns about this measure, S. 314. I was not aware that it was scheduled for the suspension calendar. I am a little surprised to see it here because it takes on a profound policy. I know my colleague from Tennessee and…
Mr. Speaker, I concur in the ranking member's remarks and the subcommittee chairman's remarks concerning this bill. ... we have to go back and make some modifications to clarify intent and to eliminate ambiguity.





