If there were not a subsidy, we would not have the $164 million in the bill that we have before us. It is just economic sense. If these forests cannot pay for themselves, if these forests do not pay to cut these trees down, and I tell my colleagues, our forestry practices are a disaster because of incidents like this. Go out and fly over the 400,000 miles of roads that they have constructed that are in disrepair and will never be taken care of. At the rate we are going, we are just destroying the environment, is what we are doing, and it does not make economic sense. We would not have to have this money in the bill. Our forestry practices have resulted in just the prime cuts going. So the areas that remain, yes, they are below cost, because the prime areas have been cut out. It takes money, obviously, to restore these areas today. That is what is going on, is the type of cuts, and what is left simply does not make sense in terms of the economics. That is why we will have to have more and more money each year to deal with this particular problem.
Bruce F. Vento: “If there were not a subsidy, we would not have the $164 million in the bill that we have before us. It is just economic…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the economic implications of forestry practices and subsidies.
Share
More from Bruce F. Vento
Mr. Speaker, I rise in certainly strong support of it. I would just point out to my colleagues that Alaska under the land use laws that were passed in ANILCA and in other land use laws is already treated special by permitting airplanes to…
I think a well-crafted law on concessions here, very prescriptive, not leaving a lot of room obviously could present some problems to any administrator, including Secretary of Interior Babbitt or his successors. But most of these laws are…
this is a bad rule and a bad deal, but it is the only option we will get in this Republican controlled House. The effort here is to try and defeat, and if not to defeat to undercut, any positive step to make a downpayment upon true…
It is time for Congress to push forward a wilderness agenda and teach our children a land use ethic that will protect the land and its creatures for generations to come.





