The gentleman is aware, of course, there are literally millions of acres of BLM land that is not designated as wilderness or park in the measure that is before us. Immediately in this area, of course, there was a concern in terms of designating wilderness in some area, 100,000 acres. What we are doing in this instance with this amendment is keeping it not as a wilderness designation but as a study area. The concern, as the gentleman from California knows, is that the military, the Army and the Department of Defense, have not requested or asked us for withdrawal or sought a withdrawal of any other land as of this time. We do not know what the request will be, if there will be a request forthcoming. We are going the extra mile by obviously recognizing that this is in the planning stages at various points, and in this particular instance responding by not designating it, by treating it as wilderness study.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the designation of BLM land and military land withdrawal during a legislative debate.
Share
More from Bruce F. Vento
Reclaiming my time, I might say that the Natural Resources Committee is one of the most productive committees and produces--works on a lot of different proposals that are complex. The types of changes included in this substitute, I might…
H.R. 2473, the Montana Wilderness Act, as reported by the Committee on Natural Resources, addresses the controversy over 6 million acres of national forest roadless lands in Montana. The committee's bill is an important conservation…
I would further state, I want to make it clear that I do not accept, and I think that we really need to come to a common understanding as to what the backlog figures are for the National Park Service in terms of roads, in terms of land…
S. 341 would provide for a land exchange between the United States and two counties in western Colorado. The bill is similar to one passed by the House in the last Congress on which action was not completed prior to the sine die…





