this is, I suppose in some minds, a technical amendment. What the bill has done is provides the flexibility for the Secretary, based on findings by the local housing management authority, to change the 50 percent very low-income definition to raise it or lower it, depending upon local conditions, and to, on the 80 percent, and this really deals with the percentages in the bill, on the 80 percent, to change that, in fact; either raise or lower it, depending on local circumstances and findings. Mr. Chairman, I have no objection to the Secretary having this flexibility. In fact, I think that it is necessary. I am concerned that the bill appears to limit this solely to the local housing management's findings. I think it is clear to me that since the Secretary has to approve it, that indeed he has and should set some standards as to what those findings are.
Bruce F. Vento: “this is, I suppose in some minds, a technical amendment. What the bill has done is provides the flexibility for the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing amendments related to housing authority flexibility in a bill.
Share
More from Bruce F. Vento
I was one that voted against the transfer of this money, because I am concerned about housing and the problems that we have had with the ownership and the goals of ownership of housing in the Nation and did not want to take away from the…
I wish both of them continued success in their endeavors and congratulate them on an outstanding season.
I would like to express my vigorous opposition to H.R. 1695, the ``Ivanpah Valley Airport Public Lands Transfer Act.'' Since this project could not meet the environmental or procedural expectations of the federal government to transfer…
I, without equivocation, rise in strong opposition to this legislation. I obviously understand the problem that the committee was trying to solve and the necessity to deal with electronic or e-commerce, and to try to provide the legal…





