Mr. Chairman, generally I think that first of all wilderness permits emergency and lifesaving and so forth and does permit the use of motorized vehicles in those instances. There is a unique problem here, a dilemma, apparently, in essence. I just want to ask a question of the sponsor. On page 6 of his amendment his talks about "before the enactment of this act." In other words, he is talking about a date immediately before the enactment of the act. Is that the concern here? In other words, the standard here is what are the activities immediately, the activities that have gone on for 50 years? I think there is some misinterpretation here.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing concerns about wilderness permits and motorized vehicle use during a committee meeting.
Share
More from Bruce F. Vento
H.R. 2473, the Montana Wilderness Act, as reported by the Committee on Natural Resources, addresses the controversy over 6 million acres of national forest roadless lands in Montana. The committee's bill is an important conservation…
The gentleman is aware, of course, there are literally millions of acres of BLM land that is not designated as wilderness or park in the measure that is before us. Immediately in this area, of course, there was a concern in terms of…
Reclaiming my time, we have accommodated the corridor between Twenty-nine Palms and Fort Irwin in this legislation. We have taken other areas and placed them in the wilderness study rather than in the wilderness designation, so if there…
It is time that Congress breath new life into Wilderness Preservation System and expand on its already diverse portfolio.





