What I have recognized in my years of involvement with this issue is that the producing side of the sugar industry is very willing to create a dynamic program that does not cost the American taxpayer any money, creates a stability of price both at the farm level and also at the manufacturing level and, ultimately, the consumer level. That has been the historic pattern of a sugar policy, except for just the last 2 years. In fact, over the course of the last decade, this program has not cost the American taxpayer any money. It has returned money to the Treasury of the United States. In fact, it has made money for taxpayers. The program of acquiring from the market, holding, and ultimately entering the market with the product has served us well. There is now a large supply of sugar worldwide, including in the United States. Some have argued that if you kill the program, down comes the price and the consumer benefits. Ironically, that just isn't true.
Angie Craig: “What I have recognized in my years of involvement with this issue is that the producing side of the sugar industry is…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of the national sugar policy during debate on the Harkin farm bill.
Share
More from Angie Craig
The reason why we haven’t been able to get year-round E15 across the finish line is because the Trump administration is in the pocket of Big Oil.
The attacks from my opponent fall flat when this moment calls for leaders who can take accountability and take on tough fights – not watch from the sidelines.
As a mom, I know how important youth sports are for our kids, but thanks to private equity firms monopolizing sports leagues and jacking up prices for parents, sports are becoming less and less accessible to everyday folks.
I’m a proud DFLer. Every letter has meaning to me. But the DFL endorsement process just doesn’t reflect the full scope of the party that we are. And the purple state that we have become.





