They say the definition of control is in the eye of the beholder and ultimately in the eye of the court, and that is where I believe this relationship will go if it is a mandate of Federal law. We must know where we are going. Is it only an updating of the Packers and Stockyards Act? I think not. I think it is an entirely different relationship of which we need to be clearly aware. When we are talking competitiveness, I want ranchers of Idaho to be as competitive as possible. What I am frustrated about, and the Purdue University study says it, what about the fringe area where there is only one packinghouse? If this goes through, are we assuming packers are going to go out and build new plants around the West? The West is a fringe area. We have heard from my colleagues from Idaho. Idaho and Wyoming fit that definition. Our livestock must move elsewhere, or at least to the edge of our borders, to be processed and ultimately to be marketed. That is why capacity, throughput, all of those kinds of things, through contract relationships and owner relationships, has built stability within that market--and competition, and I hope pricing. If I am wrong, the study will prove it.
Angie Craig: “They say the definition of control is in the eye of the beholder and ultimately in the eye of the court, and that is…”
On the recordFebruary 12, 2002
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of federal law on ranchers and packinghouses in the West.
Share
More from Angie Craig
Apr 29, 2026
better late than never bipartisanship. We are happy to agree to these amendments en bloc, and I would be proud to support it. I just want to say that some of the rhetoric though coming out and the lack of fact-based--it is not that…
Aug 11, 2026
State fraud is the No 1 issue as Minnesota voters go to the polls in November.
Aug 11, 2026
The attacks from my opponent fall flat when this moment calls for leaders who can take accountability and take on tough fights – not watch from the sidelines.
Jun 8, 2026
It’s not really democracy when 1,200 people get to pick who our candidates are in America. It doesn’t allow every voice to be heard.





