I must tell you that I was very frustrated when the chairman of the Judiciary Committee asked about one nominee in particular and said we might get to him sometime next year. I do not know how to read that statement. But I will tell you, if I read it the way I thought it was intended, that is unacceptable. He has not had a hearing. And I know the chairman of the Judiciary Committee talked about the frustration of timing. But he has been before the committee since May 24. Things change around here substantially. All of us know that and accept that. But to suggest that we will not get to one of our President's important nominees for 1 year nearly after he is nominated, if that were to happen, September is going to be a pretty difficult month around here for all of us. I don't say that as a threat. I don't threaten. We know that. We don't do that in the Senate. But we cannot accept those kinds of statements coming from key chairmen of committees who have a responsibility to deal in a timely fashion with these nominees.
Angie Craig: “I must tell you that I was very frustrated when the chairman of the Judiciary Committee asked about one nominee in…”
On the recordAugust 1, 2001
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Addressing delays in the confirmation process for presidential nominees during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from Angie Craig
Jul 27, 2026
I refuse to believe that we can’t be a nation of strong borders and a nation of immigrants.
Jul 14, 2026
My coalition is statewide. I’m going everywhere. I’m talking to everyone. I’m working to bring people back to the (Democratic Party).
Aug 10, 2026
But the only way we pass any of the progressive policies that all of us here support is by winning elections and taking damn majorities.
Apr 29, 2026
Mr. Speaker, in this rule is additional funding for ICE and CBP. Let's talk about Minneapolis. Let's talk about the fact that two U.S. citizens were murdered on the streets of Minneapolis. There is no way in hell Democrats are going to…





