Madam President, if I had been present at the rollcall vote on passage of the conference report to accompany H.R. 1804, the Goals 2000 bill, I would have voted ``no.'' This is not legislation that the American people would support if they were made aware of the implications of the provisions of H.R. 1804.
Editor's note · Context
Expressing opposition to the Goals 2000 bill during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from William Ford
I am looking now, Mr. Chairman, at section 432 of the General Education Provisions Act, which was passed in 1970, and does not come up for reauthorization. It is permanent law, unless somebody introduces legislation to change it. In this…
There is a stronger correlation between being poor when you go to college and not being able to pay your loan than there is between where you finish with respect to your peers in school. If you go to college from a poor family and an…
the simplest way to describe this amendment is that it is an unnecessary solution to a nonexisting problem. But there is a perception that has been generated in one way or another that there is language in the legislation that upsets…
Mr. Chairman, if we were in a court of law, I would say this side rests at this point, because I think the gentleman has done a marvelous job of confusing the issue so badly that no one could follow his lead and vote against this bill, and…





