Bilingual education was not invented by or created by the Congress or by any State legislature. The requirement placed upon the States to provide bilingual education resulted from a Supreme Court decision, Lau versus Nichols, and the remedies developed by U.S. Commissioner of Education Jewell Bell to assist States in meeting the spirit of that decision. The Lau decision involved Chinese children from San Francisco who were dispersed into schools where there were no Chinese speaking teachers. There was a lawsuit brought on behalf of some of those students. The Supreme Court held that if the children could not be communicated with by the teacher, they could not get a free public education. If we adopt the gentleman's amendment, we abolish the help that the Federal Government gives to States and localities to provide the remedies developed to meet this Supreme Court decision.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the origins and implications of bilingual education during a debate.
Share
More from William Ford
Mr. Speaker, I want to thank the minority on the Committee on Education and Labor for their cooperation in getting this bill swiftly to the floor so that we could meet the deadline that is so important to the schools involved and just…
Mr. Chairman, if we were in a court of law, I would say this side rests at this point, because I think the gentleman has done a marvelous job of confusing the issue so badly that no one could follow his lead and vote against this bill, and…
I traveled with the Secret Service on President Clinton's trip to Europe to participate in the NATO conference and meet with President Havel of Czechoslovakia. I chair the appropriations subcommittee which funds the Secret Service. As many…
H.R. 6 is the eighth reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 [ESEA]. With the possible exception of the 1978 House consideration of ESEA, the number of amendments offered on the House floor to that act during…





