in the 104th Congress, when we passed the effective death penalty and anti-terrorism law, which covered some of this material, I remember that several Members raised concerns about this particular provision. I also remember that, right over here, a more senior Member tried to quell any fears people had by saying, do not worry, this will never apply to American citizens. This will never apply to American citizens. That is probably true. It is also true, Mr. Chairman, that the American people would never tolerate the treatment that non-citizens have endured under this doctrine. We expect in this country that our rights and protections come not from the citizenship of the defendant but from the changeless values of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. I think many Members are unaware of how this doctrine actually operates. I would ask that my colleague the gentleman from California (Mr. Campbell) engage in a colloquy with me so that we may explain exactly what happens to people who are arrested under this doctrine.
Lynn N. Rivers: “in the 104th Congress, when we passed the effective death penalty and anti-terrorism law, which covered some of this…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing concerns about the treatment of non-citizens under the anti-terrorism law.
Share
More from Lynn N. Rivers
I will vote yes for H.R. 4569 with the expectation that Senate and Conference activity will remedy the serious flaws that exist in the bill. If these inadequacies are not addressed before it returns to the House, I will not support its…
in 1913 Woodrow Wilson said: Publicity is one of the purifying elements of politics. Nothing checks all the bad practices of politics like public exposure. . . . An Irishman seen digging around the wall of a house was asked what he was…
I do not approve of nor defend, the behavior of the president that has brought us here. I have no interest in helping him avoid the legal consequences of those acts. However, I have every interest in making sure those consequences are…
I inadvertently voted ``yes'' on rollcall vote 41--H.R. 3081. It was my intention to vote ``no'' on rollcall vote 41--H.R. 3081.





