in 1913 Woodrow Wilson said: Publicity is one of the purifying elements of politics. Nothing checks all the bad practices of politics like public exposure. . . . An Irishman seen digging around the wall of a house was asked what he was doing. He answered, ``Faith, I am letting the dark out of the cellar.'' Now, that's exactly what we want to do. So said Woodrow Wilson in 1913, and it is true today. Shays-Meehan is about letting the dark out of the cellar. Shays-Meehan would ban soft money, ending an avalanche of unreported and unregulated dollars into the American political system. It would close loopholes in existing laws and would require all dollars spent on influencing elections to be open to public scrutiny. It would protect voter guides, legislative alerts, legitimate issue ads and independent expenditures, and it would operate with respect and within the First Amendment of the Constitution. Both parties have built this system we have today, and both parties must work together to change it. We must clean up the foundation of our House, the people's House, to let the dark out of the cellar. Vote for Shays-Meehan.
Lynn N. Rivers: “in 1913 Woodrow Wilson said: Publicity is one of the purifying elements of politics. Nothing checks all the bad…”
Editor's note · Context
Advocating for the Shays-Meehan campaign finance reform legislation.
Share
More from Lynn N. Rivers
over the weekend, when I was driving to my district, I came up behind a car that had a bumper sticker that read ``Invest in America; buy a congressman.'' Interestingly enough, my chief of staff saw the same bumper sticker here in…
can the gentleman think of any circumstances where an American citizen here in the United States would be subject to the same sort of treatment?
the previous speaker mentioned the Constitution, and I think it is important that we collectively take a look at what constitutional case law tells us what Congress can do as it addresses campaign finance reform. Congress can prohibit the…
I got involved with the particular efforts around campaign finance reform for one reason, because they were bipartisan. I did not believe that there was any chance to change the way this body operates unless there were people on both sides…





