over the weekend, when I was driving to my district, I came up behind a car that had a bumper sticker that read ``Invest in America; buy a congressman.'' Interestingly enough, my chief of staff saw the same bumper sticker here in Washington, D.C. Apparently, this is a more widespread view than many of us would hope. It was fascinating to me, as I watched the earlier debate, that both parties, both sides of the aisle spent a certain amount of time attacking one another from where their monies were coming from, hoping that they would create some sort of suspicion on the part of the people watching at home about the other side and the availability of dollars and the source of dollars to them. I think that both sides succeeded. I think that the people at home believe that neither side is particularly clean about money. People at home believe that something has to be done about the campaign finance system in this country. The gentleman from Texas said the issue here is speech. No, the issue here is trust, how we are going to build a system that people at home can trust. I believe that we can have a system that protects free speech and is trustworthy, and I believe Shays-Meehan provides just that.
Lynn N. Rivers: “over the weekend, when I was driving to my district, I came up behind a car that had a bumper sticker that read ``Invest…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing campaign finance reform and public trust in the political system.
Share
More from Lynn N. Rivers
there is a very interesting debate going on here, because the arguments are being put forward as if there is currently a provision within the system that allows for an offset of one individual, if a wealthy individual runs against them…
in 1913 Woodrow Wilson said: Publicity is one of the purifying elements of politics. Nothing checks all the bad practices of politics like public exposure. . . . An Irishman seen digging around the wall of a house was asked what he was…
I found it very interesting to hear the comments from the gentleman from Pennsylvania because I was very concerned when this came forward about what evil was trying to be remedied by this particular amendment. What the gentleman had to say…
I wanted to make sure the gentleman understood this issue in context. The argument seems to be that only people who are concerned about the constitutionality of their bill would disagree to a nonseverability clause. But a very quick review…





