I rise against this rule, and I raise my voice in support of a straight up or down vote on Shays-Meehan. The Supreme Court of the United States has laid out very clearly for all of us the role that Congress can play in regulating elections in this country. They have told us that Congress can prohibit the use of corporate treasury funds and union dues money in Federal elections. They have told us that we may limit contributions to candidates, parties and political committees; that we may pass laws to combat actual corruption and the appearance of corruption in the operation of the Federal Government; that we can require disclosure of the source and size of certain kinds of spending and most contributions; and that we can regulate coordinated expenditures to thwart attempts to circumvent existing election law. That is what the Supreme Court has already said. Shays-Meehan does no more than what the Supreme Court has already endorsed, and it does no more than what is right. I urge Members to vote against this rule and support Shays-Meehan.
Lynn N. Rivers: “I rise against this rule, and I raise my voice in support of a straight up or down vote on Shays-Meehan. The Supreme…”
Editor's note · Context
Speaking in opposition to a procedural rule regarding the Shays-Meehan campaign finance reform legislation.
Share
More from Lynn N. Rivers
the previous speaker mentioned the Constitution, and I think it is important that we collectively take a look at what constitutional case law tells us what Congress can do as it addresses campaign finance reform. Congress can prohibit the…
in 1913 Woodrow Wilson said: Publicity is one of the purifying elements of politics. Nothing checks all the bad practices of politics like public exposure. . . . An Irishman seen digging around the wall of a house was asked what he was…
Once he is incarcerated, is held awaiting further proceedings, if his family comes to the place that he is being held, can they find out what charges are being put against him, what evidence might exist, what is happening to him, when they…
I think when my colleague looks at the real data, that what he will find, and I know and I am familiar with the study, and if the gentleman had been at the Committee on Science, he would have seen a lot of the problems with that study when…





