I wanted to make two comments to my friend from Arizona, the first one being relative to the argument that the President has already spent $2 billion of Social Security money. My recollection is that that came through the House here as a bill that actually was passed by this House. I know a significant number of Democrats did not vote for it, which suggests to me that a significant number of Republicans did therefore join the President in the decision to do that. So I think that when we talk about that particular issue, we should be talking about the fact that a bipartisan group, the President and a bipartisan group of Members of the House and the Senate decided to make that decision. It clearly was not a unilateral decision made on the part of the President. Secondly, my friend from Arizona pointed out that he would invite people to join him on educational issues and it was said in such a way to suggest that perhaps I was being disingenuous in my concern. The issue that I raised was that in the Committee on the Budget, several people had talked about the desire to have the greatest impact on local education by fully funding the Federal portion of special education.
Lynn N. Rivers: “I wanted to make two comments to my friend from Arizona, the first one being relative to the argument that the President…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing bipartisan decisions regarding Social Security and the importance of funding special education.
Share
More from Lynn N. Rivers
for some reason this debate always moves me to use literary reference to illustrate my point. Last Congress I relied on Dr. Seuss and his work, The Cat in the Hat. This year, as I contemplated this upcoming argument, I was struck by the…
That is what I was trying to say, is if we step outside of the law as it exists regarding independent expenditures, it is the FEC who enforces that; is it not?
when the gentleman from North Carolina (Mr. Hefner) a few minutes ago raised the issue of honesty in ads, there was quite a lot of discussion about that. The argument was that courts could determine the honesty of particular ads and the…
in 1913 Woodrow Wilson said: Publicity is one of the purifying elements of politics. Nothing checks all the bad practices of politics like public exposure. . . . An Irishman seen digging around the wall of a house was asked what he was…





