Our amendment to sections 621(a) and 621(d)(1)(D) of S. 783 would preclude the Federal Trade Commission and the States from obtaining civil penalties for initial violations of section 622(a)(1) relating to the reporting of information by creditors to consumer report agencies. My question is if a creditor is found liable for violation of section 622(a)(1) by either the Commission or the States, and has been put under order, is it the intent of your amendment to preclude the Commission and States from seeking civil penalties for violations of Commission or State orders prohibit such conduct in the future?
Donald Riegle: “Our amendment to sections 621(a) and 621(d)(1)(D) of S. 783 would preclude the Federal Trade Commission and the States…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing amendments related to civil penalties for creditors in consumer reporting.
Share
More from Donald Riegle
Let me continue by saying I will take the issue up with the regulators. We will see what can be done. They are in the process right now of attempting to reevaluate how the CRA process is applied and made to work and is measured. I think…
Yes. I have received 16 letters from State banking organizations from across the country expressing concerns that the language in the House bill gives foreign banks competitive advantages. These State banking organizations have all…
This past week, my mother passed away. The onset of the serious health problems that took her life came quite quickly. As a result, I was not here for most of last week. But many colleagues and others connected to the Senate were most…
Yes. They have all of the same rights as U.S. banks. Under the Senate bill, foreign banks can acquire and combine banks on an interstate basis just like U.S. banks if they use the structure required of domestic U.S. banking organizations…





