Well, if it weren't for the big short, you would have been deeply in the red that year, wouldn't you?
Carl Levin
The Public Record
Carl Levin was a prominent American politician who served as a United States Senator from Michigan from 1979 until 2015. A member of the Democratic Party, Levin was known for his leadership on the Senate Armed Services Committee, where he played a key role in shaping U.S. military policy and defense spending. Throughout his tenure, he was an advocate for various issues, including environmental protection and consumer rights.
But you guys wanted to take a heck of a lot more risk on shorts, and that is, according to your own numbers, what happened.
And that group made, as I understand it, $3.7 billion on the short side, basically, right?
You said they only used half of the suggestions. I am asking you--they did not use, you said--or they did use half.
You guys were profitable, and you were profitable because you had invested heavily in shorts.
So you would agree that you were in a net short position for most of the year? Would you agree to that?
Do you see where the second paragraph says, 'At the end of the meeting, the Paulson team'--this is you speaking--'told us that they were happy to have met'...
During most of 2007, we maintained a net short sub-prime position and therefore stood to benefit from declining prices in the mortgage market
You ought to have plenty of regrets. I do not think that you are willing to acknowledge them, but you ought to have them.
Do you think that a customer has a right to believe that you want that security to succeed?
You think, hey, give the less flexible folks to our customers. We will save the more flexible for ourselves.





