By definition, the incident now being discussed occurred 13 years ago. It was discussed extensively at the time. I believe no useful purpose is served by raising it at this time, discussing it, and debating it further. I would like to again implore my colleagues to get back to the bill. I hope and encourage my colleagues to do so. This matter is over 13 years old. No purpose is served in it being brought up again here today and debated here today. I hope very much that my colleagues will go back to the bill.
George Mitchell: “By definition, the incident now being discussed occurred 13 years ago. It was discussed extensively at the time. I…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the relevance of a past incident during a legislative debate.
Share
More from George Mitchell
Israel's gains are substantial in terms of degrading Hamas' capability first through the tunnels to have the fighters enter Israel and then secondly, it's capacity to launch missiles to Israel.
I think both sides are calculating their gains and losses and I think fairly soon the time will come when they will coincide in deciding that it's in their interest to end this round of the conflict.
It is feasible. We tried that. I tried very hard in behalf of President Obama to get the Arab states to take steps in the direction of normalization, based on the Arab peace initiative, proposed initially by King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia.
When I first went to the Middle East, I went to 17 countries and I met with the leaders there many, many times, and every time they would criticize American policy, I would ask what do you think our policy should be?





