This is a 2-year authorization. I will say that I as well accept the gentleman's amendment. I think what we will do, though, between now and the conference committee and beyond is to look into the issue of navigation concerns. I know that GPS is an up-and-coming technology that more and more people are purchasing and using and is probably the best type of system that anybody could have. However, I do think for the next few years, maybe even the next decade or so, we need to consider ourselves those people who do not have that technology who may have to rely upon the foghorn system. I am not sure what the foghorn sounds like. I wonder if the gentleman from Michigan-- --
Wayne Gilchrest: “This is a 2-year authorization. I will say that I as well accept the gentleman's amendment. I think what we will do…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing navigation technology and its implications during a floor debate.
Share
More from Wayne Gilchrest
I would like to invite Mr. Farr from California to ply the placid waters of the Sassafras River and enjoy either a dawn or sunset in a canoe as we go past the marsh and beautiful forested areas along the coastal Chesapeake Bay. I want to…
I think this is something that can be worked out on a bipartisan basis, and doesn't need to be one side of the aisle, and doesn't need to be contentious.
Was it the intent of this Congress that that particular statute be applied to a peace officer or a border agent in defense of the country, the border or his own life?
There are ways to continue the objectives of the Endangered Species Act that would be less time consuming, less litigious, less burdensome.





