The majority leader may not know, and I certainly understand that. We will see what differences might exist. If there are any substantive changes in the bill, we would hope that it would be subjected to a hearing or at least a markup. But the gentleman believes there is no substantive change. Is that accurate? Mr. McCARTHY. That is very accurate. This is a bipartisan, bicameral agreement based upon the 2017 NDAA bill, which, if you watched, had 375 votes in the House, 92 in the Senate. As you know as well as I do, and we have talked many times together about this, we cannot continue to have our military continue further with just the CR. If you have a continuing resolution, you now are saying that you have to fund what was last year. You can't go through with what the future needs without putting together the appropriations process. And this is what we are going through right now.
Share & report
More from Steny Hoyer
The problem with simple solutions is they are usually not correct, although I share the view that we need to slow, very, very substantially, those who come in, and we need to fix the immigration system.
Mr. Speaker, I applaud and support the remarks of the gentlewoman from North Carolina (Ms. Ross). We must be on Ukraine's side and against dictators, despots, and war criminals. HONORING BEVERLY BYRON Mr. Speaker, I rise today to honor a…
Madam Speaker, 1 minute is too little time. The Financial Services bill is a good bill. It is the responsible alternative. It is ironic that the group that has made compromise the most difficult over the last year continues to oppose…
Mr. Speaker, the same day Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu addressed our Congress and spoke of how Iran has exported anti-Semitism around the world, including the United States, we saw reminders of that disgusting and dangerous…





