I do want to make the point that I don't think we have much difference on that issue because we agree that technology has changed. As we all know, there is a switch here in the United States now that the 1978 law did not anticipate. Frankly, I don't think there is a great deal of contention. I think in a bipartisan fashion we believe that needs to be addressed. We addressed it in our bill and the Senate addressed it in their bill. Frankly, I don't think that is one of the items in contention. In fact, I would suggest to my friend we could deal with the immunity issue, which looks back not at present capacity nor future capacity, and resolve that issue in a separate bill if that was the concern about going forward. I think that could be done relatively quickly. My only point to the gentleman is I agree with you, technology has changed. I think there is bipartisan agreement we need to address that and facilitate the foreign-to-foreign intercept with a blanket approval simply related to process, and I think we could do that relatively easily because I don't think that is particularly contentious between us.
On the recordFebruary 7, 2008
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the need for legislative updates to address changes in technology.
Share
More from Steny Hoyer
Aug 15, 2026
this month’s job report is another reminder that, while this President keeps trying to change the subject, the numbers tell the same devastating story.
Aug 13, 2026
The threat posed by Putin, sowing global instability, kidnapping children, and targeting civilians, demands comprehensive and resolute action.
Jul 19, 2026
The proposed Regulation for Federal Financial Assistance represents a threat to every one of those efforts to better American lives, strengthen our economy, and keep our country competitive.
Jul 24, 2026
Have you received any directions from OMB at any time during the course of your administration at the SBA, to not disburse funding that has been appropriated?





