I think we both agree that continuing to fund government on either a 2-week or 3-week cycle is not what we ought to be doing. Furthermore, a number of economists have indicated that if, in fact, we proceed to funding levels that reflect H.R. 1, the funding levels that are included in H.R. 1 on a week-to-week basis, which leads me to believe that if we are having a 3-week extension will be somewhere in the neighborhood of $6 billion in additional reductions.
Hoyer discusses the implications of short-term government funding and its economic impact.
Share
More from Steny Hoyer
We cannot turn the clock back to the time before the ADA, when those with disabilities were ostracized, isolated, and locked away.
Senate Republicans’ vote in the Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee to hold him in contempt of Congress is nothing short of a witch-hunt instigated by President Trump and whose purpose is to achieve Republicans’ goal of…
Political will, I suggest again, Congressman, is, in fact, the answer, not weakening the Congress of the United States.
For more than four years, Ukrainians have courageously defended their free democracy against Russia’s determined effort to stamp it out and impose despotism on its people.
Other voices in this conversation
