It is my position, in the Republican tradition of using reconciliation for very major pieces of legislation, all of your tax bills in 2001 and 2003; as a matter of fact, reconciliation has been used 22 times since 1980. Sixteen of those times it was used by the Republican Party when you were in charge. Apparently you thought that was a procedure that was appropriate to pass. As a matter of fact, Judd Gregg, when he was criticizing us for criticizing reconciliation, said, ``What is wrong with a majority vote?'' We think there is nothing wrong with a majority vote. There is a filibuster in the Senate. That is under their rules. I think those rules are impeding the work of the American people. But be that as it may, they are the rules. There is also a rule that provides for consideration of legislation through a process that is called reconciliation, a fancy name for simply saying there are things that are important, you can put them on the table, you can pass them in a time frame. But, as Americans would expect, a majority of the representatives of the American people have to vote for it. So I am not going to take that off the table.
Editor's note · Context
Hoyer discusses the use of reconciliation in passing major legislation and the importance of majority votes.
Share
More from Steny Hoyer
Madam Administrator, with all due respect, I've asked you two direct questions, you have not answered either one of them.
But I really say that as we did under Ronald Reagan – I was here all eight years he was president – and George Bush, we rarely shut down the government. Under Joe Biden with a Republican Congress, we didn't shut down the government at all…
We’re glad to see the Court acknowledge this fact, ruling that the Trump Administration’s actions are unlawful and void.
This bill would impose the toughest sanctions we can on Putin’s inner circle, Russia’s oil and gas oligarchs, its shadow fleet of oil tankers, and its financial sector – all of which have sustained Russia’s war machine.





