On the recordOctober 16, 2019
It wasn't fine. It clearly was a quid pro quo. It didn't need to be stated this is the quid and that's the pro.
Source
transcripts.cnn.comEditor's note · Context
Hoyer asserts that the president's actions constituted a clear quid pro quo.
Share
More from Steny Hoyer
Jul 23, 2026
I believe these proposals do exactly the opposite of what we need to do in the sense that I think they weaken greatly the Congress and strengthen – even more than has happened today – the presidency, making the executive extraordinarily…
Jul 27, 2026
Today, I join in celebrating the thirty-sixth anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) – pivotal legislation that reshaped the lives of millions of Americans living with disabilities, guaranteeing them equal access and…
Aug 14, 2026
“I look forward to working with my colleagues to reach agreement and pass robust and bipartisan sanctions legislation. We must send the strongest possible message of American support as Ukraine defends democracy against despotism.”
Jul 27, 2026
So, our work continues, and we will keep fighting diligently so that every American may enjoy the promises upon which our nation was founded – liberty and justice for all.
Other voices in this conversation
