Reclaiming my time, when this proposal was originally made, I said if it is a proposal in lieu of ensuring proper pay for Federal employees, then I would oppose it, and I would oppose it vigorously. I do not think the administration is yet for parity. They did not offer parity. This Congress has repeatedly said they are for parity. In fact, the President's pay advisory committee says that civilians are further behind comparable private sector jobs than the military. In light of that, certainly we must adopt the premise that 4.1 percent pay raise will be adopted; but I say to my friend that if this is solely for the purposes of supplementation, then I think that it is not objectionable. But my concern is that they fund this, but not the pay raise.
Steny Hoyer: “Reclaiming my time, when this proposal was originally made, I said if it is a proposal in lieu of ensuring proper pay…”
On the recordMay 22, 2003
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing federal employee pay and the need for parity during a congressional debate.
Share
More from Steny Hoyer
Jul 21, 2026
From day one, Team Maryland has worked together closely to ensure that the Key Bridge is rebuilt as safely, quickly, and cost-effectively as possible.
Aug 12, 2026
We must send the strongest possible message of American support as Ukraine defends democracy against despotism.
Aug 18, 2026
We’re glad to see the Court acknowledge this fact, ruling that the Trump Administration’s actions are unlawful and void.
Aug 11, 2026
I’m proud to join former Chairman McCaul to introduce this legislation in the House, a companion to the Sanctioning Russia Act, which the late Sen. Lindsey Graham negotiated in his final days, along with Sen. Blumenthal, Ranking Member…





