I don't think this was intended necessarily to be precedent-setting. The precedent, of course, has been that administrations, Republican and Democratic, have discussed with Republican and Democratic Congresses the timing and conditions under which these would be sent forward. We did not believe that had been accomplished this time. The administration's perspective was that there had not been response to their attempts to do so. Whatever the reasons, the answer to your question is we do not believe at this point in time that this is precedent for the two pending agreements. But I don't want to by that response represent, if we were confronted with the same set of conditions, that is, that we did not reach agreement on how those agreements were moving forward, that this might not be again something that might be considered. But it is not precedent.
On the recordApril 10, 2008
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of agreements between the administration and Congress.
Share
More from Steny Hoyer
Jul 21, 2026
From day one, Team Maryland has worked together closely to ensure that the Key Bridge is rebuilt as safely, quickly, and cost-effectively as possible.
Aug 13, 2026
Right now, Ukrainians are fighting bravely on the front lines of a war not only for the survival of their independent nation but for the future of democracy and respect for international law.
Jul 27, 2026
So, our work continues, and we will keep fighting diligently so that every American may enjoy the promises upon which our nation was founded – liberty and justice for all.
Aug 12, 2026
We must send the strongest possible message of American support as Ukraine defends democracy against despotism.





