I thank the gentleman. I was quoting, not imputing. Mr. Jordan's comments seem to be pretty clear. Before we conclude, the STOCK Act, Tim Walz had a bill that was ready for markup in the committee. We understand that was pulled. As you know, that bill has 220 cosponsors and is a bipartisan sponsorship. It simply says that Members should not use insider information to trade with, information the general public may not have about legislation that may or may not be reported or passed to the floor. And I understand that was pulled. I think that was unfortunate. Can the gentleman tell me what the status of that piece of legislation is?
Share & report
More from Steny Hoyer
This amendment, of course, is an add and subtract and will have no fiscal impact, and the policies do bear problems on this side of the aisle as to the implications they may have. Mr. Chairman, I reserve the balance of my time.
You are on your own, consumer. You are on your own, Mom. You are on your own, Dad. That is what they said in the 1920s. I keep repeating it: You are on your own. The markets went wild, and they crashed, and millions and millions and…
Do you understand if we do this amendment, then any subject that anybody has an interest in would be subject to such an amendment? Now, the Rules Committee has waived points of order contrary to what they said they wanted done when we were…
I rise as the designee of the gentlewoman from Connecticut, and I move to strike the last word. The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Maryland is recognized for 5 minutes.





