I thank the gentleman for that comment. I know the gentleman will be brief today. But I do want to ask a question with reference to the 302(a) allocations, 302(b) allocations that the Appropriations Committee dealt with and then dealt with a product consistent with those numbers. It is my understanding that that has now changed or is expected to change in terms of the 302(b) allocation numbers and that they are being modified; am I correct? As I understand it, they have not been modified in the Appropriations Committee and will not be subject to a vote in the Appropriations Committee, and that that number out of the Appropriations Committee may not be the number that will be reported out to the floor next week. Is that correct?
Share & report
More from Steny Hoyer
The same day Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu addressed our Congress and spoke of how Iran has exported anti-Semitism around the world, including the United States, we saw reminders of that disgusting and dangerous influence just…
1 minute is too little time. The Financial Services bill is a good bill. It is the responsible alternative. It is ironic that the group that has made compromise the most difficult over the last year continues to oppose compromise…
I thank the gentlewoman for yielding. I rise today, as I have before, to speak up for a brave American, Itay Chen. It has been 115 days since Hamas took Itay hostage while he was serving in the IDF. He is only 19 years of age. This Friday…
I don't want to prolong this debate, but to hear about election denial from the other side of the aisle is extraordinary, and it is extraordinarily inconsistent with the performance of the former President who lied regularly. Mr. Chair, I…





