I thank the gentleman for his generosity. But let me say to the gentleman, it may be unprecedented times; but it does not warrant this unprecedented abdication of democracy in this House in setting what is probably the most critical question that confronts government: How much are you going to pay for it? I think we all agree on that. That's what is at issue here. And this resolution does not allow Members of Congress to engage on that. It simply gives to one person the ability to set that number. It's not only unprecedented; it, in my opinion, is undemocratic--with a small ``d.'' It does not provide the transparency and the openness of which the gentleman has correctly spoken and I hope we pursue. And I hope that we oppose this resolution.
Share & report
More from Steny Hoyer
Section 550 of the bill seems to do the same thing. Reading from the bill itself, it says: ``None of the funds made available in this act may be used to finalize, implement, or enforce the proposed rule entitled `The Enhancement and…
The gentlewoman has said that I have said that there are no funds. There are no funds. Nevertheless, she said that because of this amendment, she is going to handcuff the administration. You can't handcuff the administration prohibiting…
Thank God for that. Let me say that in the concept of what we are doing, this is necessary, forgetting about any of the other issues. I understand what he is saying. I disagree with him, but I appreciate his position and why he is saying…
I claim the time in opposition to the amendment. The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Maryland is recognized for 5 minutes.





