I wish the gentleman would not take down the chart, because I want to read from his very beautiful chart. He read 1990, 51; 1991, 36 days; 1992, 57 days; 1993, 5 days; 1994, 41 days, then came 1995 which, of course, we passed in 1994, the last year the Democrats were in charge. And he gave correctly the credit to the gentleman from Wisconsin (Mr. Obey) for having 0 days, but then he stopped. As I read the gentleman's chart, the next year, which was the first year that the Republicans were in charge, the gentleman, of course, was not chairman of the Committee on Appropriations at that point in time, we were at 208 days, which was more than all the other years combined that the gentleman read. I wondered why the gentleman stopped at that.
Steny Hoyer: “I wish the gentleman would not take down the chart, because I want to read from his very beautiful chart. He read 1990…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing appropriations days in relation to party control during a floor debate.
Share
More from Steny Hoyer
Once again, this Administration is trying to drive hardworking public servants out of government, delivering the 'trauma' that OMB Director Russ Vought promised to inflict.
The threat posed by Putin, sowing global instability, kidnapping children, and targeting civilians, demands comprehensive and resolute action.
Political will, I suggest again, Congressman, is, in fact, the answer, not weakening the Congress of the United States.
This bill would impose the toughest sanctions we can on Putin’s inner circle, Russia’s oil and gas oligarchs, its shadow fleet of oil tankers, and its financial sector – all of which have sustained Russia’s war machine.





