I would prefer that perhaps we do it for a longer period of time than 1 year. Two years would be acceptable. However, the problem, of course, is paying for things. As the gentleman knows, when these bills were considered, one of the things that the minority did with their MTR was to include more spending in and strike the pay-fors, which exacerbated the bill to the tune of about $100 billion. So I think the committee is dealing with what they can pay for. There will be some things, obviously, that we have accepted as emergencies caused by the severe economic downturn. But I think the length of time will probably be dictated by the issue of how we pay for things.
On the recordMay 6, 2010
Editor's note · Context
The speaker discusses the duration and funding of proposed legislation in light of economic challenges.
Share
More from Steny Hoyer
Jul 20, 2026
That is a grave mistake and absolutely the wrong approach and a dangerous signal at a time when we ought to show unwavering support for Ukraine's defense of its homeland.
Jul 23, 2026
The Trump Administration should be ashamed of itself for proposing this pay disparity, and I urge the Senate to address it and insist on parity.
Jul 28, 2026
Madam Administrator, with all due respect, I've asked you two direct questions, you have not answered either one of them.
Aug 11, 2026
Democracy is presently under threat from despotism, and Congress must act to defend democracy and help Ukraine defeat Vladimir Putin’s effort to extinguish its liberty and sovereignty.





