I rise to simply say that, in response to my friend from Ohio (Mr. Portman), the administration is on its toes, but I am sure it is glad to hear the views of the gentleman from Ohio (Mr. Traficant) as well. I rise and will support this sense of the Congress. Clearly, as the gentleman from Ohio (Mr. Portman) has indicated, there are other criteria and there are other reasons why we move into this area or that area for assistance. However, I think the gentleman from Ohio raises a very good point and certainly his explanation earlier raised an issue of obvious concern, not only to him but to the country, in terms of making sure that those communities which have both high poverty rates and high unemployment rates should be a focus of Federal assistance so that we can bring up those areas so that they become equally successful to some other areas of the country, and I would share his view.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing federal assistance for communities with high poverty and unemployment rates.
Share
More from Steny Hoyer
But I really say that as we did under Ronald Reagan – I was here all eight years he was president – and George Bush, we rarely shut down the government. Under Joe Biden with a Republican Congress, we didn't shut down the government at all…
We will not stop fighting to fulfill our promise to the men and women of the Bureau to deliver a new, secure headquarters in Maryland so they can do their work without compromising their safety or our national security.
Democracy is presently under threat from despotism, and Congress must act to defend democracy and help Ukraine defeat Vladimir Putin’s effort to extinguish its liberty and sovereignty.
Hardworking civilian federal employees at the Defense Department are no less deserving of an annual raise than their compatriots in uniform.





