A bit more than half of all the expense budget is salaries, and we now do not have enough military personnel, who are having to extend their tours. They have been on the ground over there, reservists on the ground for a year, and now they are being extended for 3 or 4 months. So obviously unless we are going to have fewer people in the military, we are not going to be able to cut defense spending. So the gentleman is right. In a sense a lot of that is mandatory because we cannot imagine a smaller military because our present military is really not large enough to do what we are now attempting to do because we are having to extend reservists who have already been there a year.
Roscoe Bartlett: “A bit more than half of all the expense budget is salaries, and we now do not have enough military personnel, who are…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing military personnel and defense spending during a budget debate.
Share
More from Roscoe Bartlett
American taxpayers expect and deserve that Congress will make the difficult decisions to restore fiscal responsibility.
They have 1,300,000 people, 900 million of them in rural areas that through the miracle of communications know the advantages of industrialized economy, and they are saying, Hey, guys, what about us?
Another element in the discussion as to how much money we will spend in the future on defense is the recognition that our robust defense spending in the past and our willingness to protect has encouraged many of our allies to be quite…
In your view, is the average citizen in these countries now better off under the dysfunctional government than they were under the tyrannical government?





