prohibiting barbaric partial- birth abortions is a matter of whether we are a civilized society, not whether we are pro-life or pro-choice. It is a sad commentary on the slippery slope of loss of respect for the dignity of human life in our society that we in Congress once more have to debate whether it is OK to kill babies this way. Let us understand exactly what is involved in this procedure. Labor in the mother is induced, the baby is turned and then partially delivered, feet first, with its head kept inside the womb. While still living, scissors or a trocar are inserted in the back of the baby's head, its brain is then suctioned out and skull collapsed before the baby is removed from the womb. If Congress were voting about a method of execution, stabbing someone in the back of their head and sucking out their brains I am sure would not get a single vote in the Congress. If this would be wrong for the most heinous criminals, how can it be right for innocent babies? ____________________
Roscoe Bartlett: “prohibiting barbaric partial- birth abortions is a matter of whether we are a civilized society, not whether we are…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the issue of partial-birth abortion during a congressional debate.
Share
More from Roscoe Bartlett
I question the proposal to scrap aircraft currently providing intelligence support to our warfighters, including those purchased as recently as last year.
They have 1,300,000 people, 900 million of them in rural areas that through the miracle of communications know the advantages of industrialized economy, and they are saying, Hey, guys, what about us?
Another element in the discussion as to how much money we will spend in the future on defense is the recognition that our robust defense spending in the past and our willingness to protect has encouraged many of our allies to be quite…
We clearly are the most creative, innovative society in the world. We lead the world in computers and information technology.





