I am strongly supportive of expanded free and open trade, but this bill is not the way to get there. It is unconstitutional. I have here a press release from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce to the media in my district, chastising me for not supporting this bill. They make my point. Listen. ``* * * noted that with fast track, negotiators would be able to close deals.'' The President and his negotiators closed the deal. Where is the Congress? We would become merely a rubber stamp, clearly in violation of the Constitution. I am all for free and expanded trade. This is not the way to get there, at the expense of our Constitution. If we do not understand it, the U.S. Chamber understands it. The President and his negotiators would close the deal.
Roscoe Bartlett: “I am strongly supportive of expanded free and open trade, but this bill is not the way to get there. It is…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing a trade bill on constitutional grounds during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Roscoe Bartlett
Another element in the discussion as to how much money we will spend in the future on defense is the recognition that our robust defense spending in the past and our willingness to protect has encouraged many of our allies to be quite…
Can you explain why the DOD is poised to waste the $4 billion we have already spent on these aircraft that are currently providing valuable intelligence to the warfighter?
I think Roscoe Bartlett was correct when he said when we are at war and we are not getting anything for it, we are really not getting anything for it, we need to figure out, it is not that difficult to figure out where to get the money to…





