I would first like to compliment the gentleman from New York [Mr. Lazio] for his thoughtful approach to housing issues. The gentleman well knows housing issues are a major issue in my district. Mr. Chairman, I also want to compliment the gentleman from Massachusetts [Mr. Kennedy], the ranking member. We have very great philosophical differences, as the ranking member knows, but I know he believes what he says and I respect that. Mr. Chairman, the Brooke amendment, a tax on work, corrupt and inept public housing authorities, no rights and responsibilities for tenants, mixing of the elderly poor with drug addicts and alcoholics, the consistent waste of taxpayer money, all in the name of compassion. Well, what I am here to say today is that compassion is not always a function of more Federal money, nor is compassion always a function of more Federal control. Mr. Chairman, this bill represents a first positive step in what I hope will be a new era in Federal housing policy.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing housing policy and the implications of the Brooke amendment.
Share
More from Robert Ehrlich
Last night on this floor, Mr. Chairman, I talked about the substance of the ACLU lawsuit in Baltimore, the fact that special race, class, and location-based housing vouchers will become public policy outside the scope of this House, of…
Again, what was the budget figure that the Republicans propose for the next 7 years? Was it an increase of $7,200 in the year 2002, which was very close to the President's number, by the way?
Cheesy tax cut promises only make Americans cynical about government. Can you imagine that, putting more money back in your pocket so you can grow, so you can take a risk, begin a business and hire people? That makes you cynical about…
Absolutely. Eloquent rhetoric. We all sat on this floor and watched the master politician. I hate being called a politician. I know you all hate it, too. Because politicians tell people what they want to hear. I know you three and I know a…





