Very simply, this is a sense-of-the-Congress resolution that there should be parity between the adjustments and the compensation of members of the uniformed services and the adjustments and the compensation of civilian employees of the United States. In almost every year over the past two decades, there have been equal adjustments in the compensation of members of the uniformed services and the compensation of civilian employees of the United States, and this expresses the sense of the Congress that this parity in adjustments should continue. I very strongly urge my colleagues to be supportive of this amendment.
John Sarbanes: “Very simply, this is a sense-of-the-Congress resolution that there should be parity between the adjustments and the…”
Editor's note · Context
Introducing an amendment for parity in compensation adjustments between uniformed services and civilian employees.
Share
More from John Sarbanes
The goal was not to federalize elections across the country; the goal was to set some uniform standards.
Without the strong and continued investment the EPA has requested for the Chesapeake Bay Program in fiscal year 2024, the risk is we could jeopardize decades of work in collaboration towards the Bay's restoration.
Each of which--each of which--would hamper EPA's ability to regulate air pollution and, unfortunately, continues this Republican agenda of putting Big Oil interests over the interests of the public.
We would like to thank Rep. Sarbanes for introducing this important piece of bipartisan legislation





