Why are these public officials concerned about this bill? Why are these associations that represent public officials all across our Nation concerned about this bill? Because these public officials invest taxpayers' funds and public employees' pension funds in securities. And they fear they will be left without remedies if they are defrauded. Testifying before the Senate Banking Committee, Mayor Harry Smith of Greenwood, MS, warned: The most potent protection investors have is the private right of action. To remove that protection could have grave consequences. We oppose taking such a risk. We oppose preemption of traditional State and local rights created to protect our citizens and taxpayers. This bill is inconsistent with Congress' renewed commitment to the preservation of federalism, and reduces protections for our retirees, employees, and taxpayers. Over two dozen law professors, including such nationally recognized securities law experts as John Coffee, Jr., Joel Seligman and Marc Steinberg, expressed their opposition in a letter earlier this year.
John Sarbanes: “Why are these public officials concerned about this bill? Why are these associations that represent public officials all…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing concerns over a bill affecting public officials' investment protections.
Share
More from John Sarbanes
Maryland's total-cost-of-care model also allows our State to invest in other health system goals, like lowering the maternal mortality rate and the opioid overdose mortality rate.
I thank the ranking member for yielding. Mr. Chair, I rise in strong opposition to this bill. Today, we are arguing about a proposed Department of Energy efficiency standard for stoves, not just gas stoves, but every sort of kitchen stove…
The goal was not to federalize elections across the country; the goal was to set some uniform standards.
The health of the Chesapeake Bay and its watershed can only continue to improve through robust Federal, state, and local partnerships.





