I missed that. But that is just another example of what may well be stacked away--it is not as though this is simply or straightforwardly a revision or an alteration of provisions directly related to homeland security which we have been dealing with here, and so there have been some changes or modifications. As I understand it, it is becoming increasingly evident that there are a number of provisions in here that have nothing to do with homeland security. Is that the Senator's understanding?
John Sarbanes: “I missed that. But that is just another example of what may well be stacked away--it is not as though this is simply or…”
On the recordNovember 15, 2002
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing concerns about unrelated provisions in a homeland security bill.
Share
More from John Sarbanes
Oct 17, 2023
We would like to thank Rep. Sarbanes for introducing this important piece of bipartisan legislation
Oct 17, 2023
I hope that today's hearing is the first step in continuing that legacy of strong bipartisan support for the Chesapeake Bay in this Congress.
Apr 25, 2023
But these are dramatic changes that can bring us to a new place and, I think, have given many people a sense of hope instead of despair in the face of what we are seeing with a warming planet.
Jun 21, 2023
Each of which--each of which--would hamper EPA's ability to regulate air pollution and, unfortunately, continues this Republican agenda of putting Big Oil interests over the interests of the public.





